<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CharlestonToday &#187; #chstoday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/tag/chstoday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlestontoday.net</link>
	<description>the best arts journalism in Charleston SC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>James Gordon House</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/james-gordon-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/james-gordon-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ingle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Looking at Charleston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#chstoday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston tours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CharlestonToday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Waddell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestontoday.net/?p=2223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[87 East Bay Street • c. 1792 This is a Charleston single house of unusual height and width. It is one-room wide with a central stair hall in the middle and rooms to either side. The private entrance is off the street, on the left side of the building. It is not a typical single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>87 East Bay Street</strong> • c. 1792</p>
<div id="attachment_2225" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1.02EBay87.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2225" title="1.02EBay87" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1.02EBay87.jpg" alt="87 East Bay Street" width="288" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">87 East Bay Street</p></div>
<p>This is a Charleston single house of unusual height and width. It is one-room wide with a central stair hall in the middle and rooms to either side. The private entrance is off the street, on the left side of the building.</p>
<p>It is not a typical single house, but it is an important example of how, in the 18th century, the back of buildings (in this case the right-hand side) were left almost wholly blank—without windows or doors—so that another building could be built next to it.</p>
<p>Single houses were typically built on a front corner of a lot. Legally, anyone who owned an adjacent lot had the right to tie into the back wall. Although construction costs could be saved by sharing a wall, most builders after the fire of 1740 preferred to build houses as far apart as possible so as to leave fire breaks in between each building. Even then they often kept the back wall blank, or nearly blank, as a fire wall.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">~ ~ ~</p>
<div id="attachment_2226" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 298px"><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1.02EBay87_back.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2226 " title="1.02EBay87_back" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/1.02EBay87_back.jpg" alt="back of 87 East Bay" width="288" height="290" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">back of 87 East Bay</p></div>
<p>In a city were ventilation was a major concern in homes, windows were added to the back of these buildings when there was enough space between buildings for it to be relatively safe. Often, as in this example, only stair windows were placed on back walls, to minimize the possibility that a fire would spread to a brick house through a window.</p>
<p>In 1792, James Gordon acquired this lot which had been vacant since the fire of 1778. He slightly enlarged it for this building. The front initially had a full-width balcony which was moved to 68 South Battery. •</p>
<hr /><em><span style="color: #993300;">Copyright Notice</span>: all material in this series is the exclusive property of Gene Waddell. If you want to reuse any of it in any form, you must get permission in writing from <a href="http://mailto:chastoday@charlestontoday.net" target="_blank">chastoday@charlestontoday.net</a>.</em></p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/james-gordon-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solutions for AT&amp;T</title>
		<link>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/solutions-for-att/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/solutions-for-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goodie Nuff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aNuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#chstoday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Nuff is a Nuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T solutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlestontoday.net/?p=2201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you can imagine, I’ve been inundated with emails about Hattie’s AT&#38;T rant. (For some reason no one’s telling her.) Anyway, based on ideas that have come in so far, here’s what I think AT&#38;T should do. First, acknowledge that there are two problems: service and customer service. The first problem is… well, have you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Goodie_post_gray.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1903" title="Gnuff_post" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Goodie_post_gray.jpg" alt="Gnuff_post" width="144" height="192" /></a>As you can imagine, I’ve been inundated with emails about <a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/09/the-new-att-is-getting-old/" target="_blank">Hattie’s AT&amp;T rant</a>. (For some reason no one’s telling her.) Anyway, based on ideas that have come in so far, here’s what I think AT&amp;T should do.</p>
<p>First, acknowledge that there are two problems: service and customer service. The first problem is… well, have you ever met <em>anyone</em> who praises AT&amp;T service? So you have to begin with the second problem, and here’s how:</p>
<p>Start by being nice. Customers will respond a lot better if you treat them like friends. Don’t be too formal. That’s an old form of customer service and people don’t like it. Try to apologize now and then for the terrible service, abysmal download speeds, frequent internet messages (“site not found, broadband error, please restart your browser”), modem mishaps, dropped calls, and pricing mistakes (or whatever they are). Let customers know—without being <em>too</em> nice about it—that the crew there is trying to right the ship.</p>
<div id="attachment_2206" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 154px"><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/onphone.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2206 " title="onphone" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/onphone.jpg" alt="“great” customer service rep" width="144" height="119" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">“great” customer service rep</p></div>
<p>The initial conversation is crucial. Right now it goes something like this: “Thanks for choosing the new AT&amp;T, my name is Raja, how can I provide the best customer service possible for you today?” followed by, “What’s your name, is this a good call back number, and just to be sure I got it, let me repeat back to you the number you just gave me.”</p>
<p>Wrong. We know who we just called, you can see our number (you’re the world’s largest telecommunications company), and the matter of great customer service should be a given. The best way to communicate it is to be it.</p>
<p>Here’s an option: “Hi, this is Raj, how can I help?” Then listen. Let customers talk about their problem right away. And whatever you do—whether you have to run some test or get more information—don’t <em>ever</em> put the customer on hold. And stop all that repeating back stuff (“Just to make sure I understand your problem, let me repeat back what you just told me”). Whose dumb business idea was that? That’s not how people talk to each other.</p>
<div id="attachment_2208" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 154px"><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/frustrated.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2208" title="frustrated" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/frustrated.jpg" alt="website madness" width="144" height="130" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">website madness</p></div>
<p>As for the number one big problem, it’s gonna be harder but it’s easy in the beginning. First, stop jerking customers around with the pricing. Be honest. And if the download speed is really going to be 200 mps, say so. Don’t charge us for 450 mps plus all the delays and interruptions. You see, we don’t mind paying for good stuff. It’s just gotta be good.</p>
<p>Next, keep things easy to understand on the web site and especially on the bills. Make these two things—your main means of reaching out to us—as intuitive and user friendly as possible. Make both a positive experience every time. Right now the web site is frustrating <em>every</em> time and opening your bill turns the stomach <em>every</em> time.</p>
<div id="attachment_2207" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 154px"><a href="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/examiningbill.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2207" title="examiningbill" src="http://www.charlestontoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/examiningbill.jpg" alt="deciphering AT&amp;T bill" width="144" height="96" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">deciphering AT&amp;T bill</p></div>
<p>The web site needs to be turned inside out so that it presents, not what you offer and want to sell us, but what we need and <em>may</em> want to buy. The bill is a maze, and we know that you know that, which is still a-mazing to us.</p>
<p>Here’s the killer though. Right now, we don’t have a choice. We have to use your services. When that changes, and it will, we’re gone unless you do something fantastic to convince us otherwise. But time’s running out. We’re not on hold. You are—for the time being.</p>
<p>But the silver lining in our angst is that we are so human that, if you can make things right, we’ll forgive you. Then we’ll stay or come running back for one simple reason: because we LOVE good service and good customer service. These days we can’t get enough of them. And it would be fantastic to see the giant change in these ways.</p>
<p>Yes, I’m an optimist. But somebody in this house has to be. •</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlestontoday.net/2009/09/11/solutions-for-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

